Africa: Still Killing Her Sun

In 1963, Julius Nyerere penned an article with the optimistic title, “The United States of Africa.” He opened with a series of claims that are worth revisiting.

There is one sense in which African unity already exists. There is a sentiment of ‘African-ness’, a feeling of mutual involvement, which pervades all the political and cultural life on the continent. Nationalist leaders all over Africa feel themselves to be part of a greater movement; they recognize a special responsibility to the political unit in which they happen to belong, but feel personally involved in the triumphs and set-backs of all other African countries. (1)

I am struck by Nyerere’s evocative phrase, “happen to belong,” a phrase that recognizes the arbitrariness of national boundaries and denaturalizes belonging. Political units are neither organic nor inevitable. They are accidental, strategic.

It is precisely this “happenstance” aspect of political units that allows Nyerere to formulate an inter-nationalist ethic. To recognize belonging as a historical accident permits us to look beyond our own units, to recognize that, given a nudge here or there, we might be in that political unit, not this.

To recognize happenstance is to cultivate care. To see oneself in faces across borders.

I begin with this utopian vision to shield myself from what follows, to modulate the cynicism against which our politics compel us to struggle.

For better or worse, Africa exists as a political unit. As the (mostly western) press has it, the world has China, India, and Africa. We have tended, since independence, to insist that Africa has individual countries and is a continent. Increasingly, I wonder what we permit by insisting on our uniqueness, by embracing organic definitions of identity and identification, by taking accident for inevitability.

My title is adapted from Ken Saro-Wiwa’s searing indictment of African politics, “Africa Kills Her Sun.” In the story, he explains, “that’s why they call it the dark continent.”

A few weeks ago, Wambui Mwangi circulated an essay that reflected on what Kenya would have done to Obama. Briefly, the essay claims Kenya would have destroyed him, as it destroys so many of our strong, beautiful, talented citizens, stealing their dreams and feeding them bitter herbs.

Her claims continue to disturb me, in part because I don’t want to believe in the dystopic vision she paints of Kenya. Yet, the list of names she offers is convincing, too convincing. Most tragically, perhaps, David Munyakei, without whose testimony the extent of the Goldenberg scandal would never have been discovered. We thanked him by ignoring him. He died like so many of our brave and beautiful, unrecognized.

We have many unmarked graves.

Whatever the outcome of Obama’s campaign, it will be tinged, across Africa, with the shame of what we permit, what we sanction by our silence, our inaction.

Darfur.

Zimbabwe.

Mugabe, the tyrant we tolerate because were we to oppose him our own shameful nakedness might be exposed. Africa gave Moi a free pass. Africa gives Mugabe a pass. We seem to have an inexhaustible number of passes for warlords and petty tyrants. I wonder if we believe that our dead bodies will fertilize arid lands, if our legacy to the future will be human-enriched soil.

With each passing day, the sun is stifled. We kill our sun.

About these ads

3 thoughts on “Africa: Still Killing Her Sun

  1. This is a powerful piece, but I wonder if the term “Africa” isn’t being asked to do two different things here: on the one hand, it signifies an identity that cannot be given up (or at least the kinds of African identity that can be practiced in positive ways), but on the other, the Saro-Wiwa “Africa” is that of political despotism, the ways that authenticity or anti-colonialism become apologias for state terror when applied to Mugabes or Mobutus. I like, for example, the way J-F- Bayart creates a genealogy of “Africa” as a political bloc (in Politics of the Belly), because it allows *that* Africa to be conceptually separable from the Africa formed by, say, imagined communities formed out of and into political solidarity.

    This isn’t, of course, a critique of what you’ve written; if the two are separable, then they are also inevitably linked and interwoven as well. But Afro-pessimism and “heart of darkness” rhetoric find such a hospitable habitat in the pages of The Economist or the ignorant yap of N. Sarkozy because they can be so easily instrumentalized in dehumanizing a continent; the trick seems to be to recognize what validity is there without giving aid and comfort to fools like them.

  2. I have to think about this a little more.

    I think there’s a fuzzines to “Africa” that I want to retain, in part or mostly because I am, above all else, interested in complicity. Also, I want to avoid taking the very defensive position many Africans take when faced with critique.

    Increasingly, I wonder about the moniker Afro-pessimism and what it seems to indicate and, more importantly, foreclose. But this, also, I need to think about more.

    On some level, a really honest Africanist self-critique will always satisfy “fools like them.” But I continue to believe that Africanists have to stop writing with the sense someone is reading over their shoulders. Practically, of course, the kind of queer critique I do cannot live alongside the image of Africa many respected Africanists want to promulgate. This, of course, is generational. That’s a whole other discussion.

    Soon as I get over Tutuola, I’ll attempt the Soyinka I promised, though, I might simply recapitulate elements of the chapter version (which I very much prefer not to do). The sucker is done and the next time I see it I’d prefer it be in book form.

  3. An author friend of mine is writing a book with a working title “Out of Control: How Kenya is sliding into civil war”. He expresses simmilar sentiments as yours. He says that Africa is emasculating its people, silencing any dissent against the power wielding elites and promoting xenophobia among the different nations(not states) that inhabit Africa.
    If Obama were a Kenyan, he would have been probably part of the Kenyan psyche, Kenya would not have killed him but would have annointed him a Lou King.
    Ken Saro-Wiwa predicted his own death at the hands of the Nigerian regime, so did many other African activists. The solution to pertinent African problem of dehumanising its people, murdering them or starving them may just be to disband the useless sovereign states that are pretenders to power.

Comments are closed.